Today's hottest deals

Dell XPS 8500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell XPS 8500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0NW73C
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 01:08
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 165
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 328
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580
Dell(1028 1701) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.9% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 71.9
36% 58.6 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 54.6
Splatting 44.2
43% 53.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 402 392 400 411 421 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 466
Write 344
Mixed 241
SusWrite 404
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 28.9
82% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 258
212% 306 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 115%
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
76GB free
Firmware: AADA4106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 226 210 195 185 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 341
Write 287
Mixed 263
SusWrite 207
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 24.2
80% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 312
241% 329 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 193%
Hitachi HDS721075KLA330 750GB-$38
225GB free
Firmware: GK8OA87A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 72.4
Write 71.9
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 70.4
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
425GB free
Firmware: CC4G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 149 148 150 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 141
Write 112
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 149
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 112%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 26 27 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 21.1
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 26.2
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
57% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
3TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 24.7
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 18.9
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 100%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 25.2
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 19.3
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB M378B1G73EB0-YK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8500 Builds (Compare 2,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback