Asrock H510M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H510M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 06:56
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 164
2-Core 310
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 908
95% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,229
76% 1,229 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.9% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 60.1
46% 61.7 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 53.6
48% 59.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 450 462 466 466 466 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 435
Mixed 352
SusWrite 460
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 47.9
174% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 238
205% 302 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
599GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 151 151 152 153 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 156
Write 151
Mixed 102
SusWrite 151
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 109%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 14.5
Mixed 18
SusWrite 19.4
26% 21 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.9
136% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Tammuz Co Ltd TZD1G808U32-SS001 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 24
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 27.6
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510M-HDV Builds (Compare 555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback