Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10MQS01U00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10MQS01U00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3111
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200115
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 22 '21 at 10:26
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 207
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 284
37% 280 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 3111) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.33 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 410 449 419 435 425 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 424
Mixed 363
SusWrite 414
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 55.1
147% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 332
256% 350 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 0L2QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 963 431 310 312 312 312 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 2,005
Write 1,555
Mixed 928
SusWrite 440
273% 1,232 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 76.7
257% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 890
DQ Mixed 964
710% 931 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 228%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 24GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 23.2
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 23.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback