HP Pro 3400 Series MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro 3400 Series MT  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '21 at 11:00
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G630-$37
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 53.7
2-Core 94.9
50% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 82.4
8-Core 123
13% 103 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2ABF) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.1
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 98 100 101 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47% Average
Read 71.5
Write 106
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 92.1
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 M378B5773CH0-CH9 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.4% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3400 Series MT Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3400 Series MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback