HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '21 at 20:00
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron X3216 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Memory 25.7
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 84.4
30% 54.1 Pts
4-Core 87.5
8-Core 86.2
12% 86.8 Pts
64-Core 86
5% 86 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD(1002 1870) 32MB
Ram: 32MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 5.3
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 6.4
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-128V2S-11 2.5 7mm 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FC7110A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 136 135 139 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 441
Write 138
Mixed 194
SusWrite 135
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 21.4
78% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 137
102% 134 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
48GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 135 135 148 164 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 173
Write 141
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 144
152% 120 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 7.1
615% 8.7 MB/s
DQ Read 10.8
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 9.5
754% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU7AFR8N-UH Samsung M391A1K43BB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.1% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 281
14% 281 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback