Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210325
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateApr 25 '21 at 01:35
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 86.5
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
93% 170 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 1,085
98% 823 Pts
64-Core 1,997
124% 1,997 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 114
Parallax 208
109% 152 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 148
Splatting 85.1
90% 113 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$185
688GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3170 907 892 959 950 960 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,103
Write 3,369
Mixed 2,282
SusWrite 1,306
512% 2,265 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 83.2
278% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 1,203
884% 1,166 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 302%
Great: 472%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
2TB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1389 1380 1373 1372 1305 1319 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,516
Write 1,382
Mixed 1042
SusWrite 1,356
298% 1,324 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 75.1
266% 96.3 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 817
DQ Mixed 567
509% 772 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 264%
Great: 282%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
1.5TB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1300 1290 1283 1297 1349 1358 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,519
Write 1,326
Mixed 1,024
SusWrite 1,313
291% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 80.3
277% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 819
DQ Mixed 471
465% 743 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 266%
Great: 282%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$87
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 174 173 174 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 165
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 172
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 121 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 142
Write 109
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 120
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 84%
H/W RAID 0 16TB
9TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 234 240 238 242 238 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 225
Mixed 123
SusWrite 238
276% 208 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 6.43 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 50.1
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 44.3
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 38.7
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 122%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $478

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback