Today's hottest deals

Asus X101CH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive8.22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X101CH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X101CH
Memory0.3 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120530
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '21 at 18:58
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N2600
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Memory 23.4
1-Core 4.7
2-Core 8.7
10% 12.3 Pts
4-Core 14
8-Core 17.4
2% 15.7 Pts
64-Core 15
1% 15 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 51 57 57 51 54 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.22% Terrible
Read 65.4
Write 76.7
Mixed 3
SusWrite 55.5
11% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
8% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.69% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 1.6
6% 1.97 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 0.2
2% 0.53 GB/s
Latency 296
14% 296 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback