Today's hottest deals

NCR 1612-8054-0000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemNCR 1612-8054-0000  (all builds)
MotherboardAAEON S500
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '21 at 00:43
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 107
2-Core 209
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 211
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
PNY(196E 053C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 2.8
7% 7.13 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 3.8
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC300 2.5 7MM 256GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20100P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 370 366 379 379 373 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 378
Mixed 316
SusWrite 371
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 36.2
134% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 276
230% 331 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
466GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 121 123 123 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 123
Write 122
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 122
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x4GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
71.8% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 21.4
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1612-8054-0000 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: NCR 1612-8054-0000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback