Today's hottest deals

CDM MS-7596

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemCDM MS-7596  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR 785GM-E51 (MS-7596)
Memory6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '17 at 09:12
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 240
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 41.1
2-Core 81.7
46% 68 Pts
4-Core 82.2
8-Core 82.3
11% 82.2 Pts
64-Core 82.3
5% 82.3 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gainward(10B0 1189) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 42.3
8% 28.3 fps
MRender 46.6
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 33.1
32% 40.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
908GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 105
Write 128
Mixed 89.6
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.58
4K Mixed 0.38
116% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra Backup 32GB
6GB free, PID 5535
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 4.76
Mixed 8.49
11% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.84
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.01
15% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.5% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback