Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) 15,014 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Memory 32.5 1-Core 21.8 2-Core 13.4 17% 22.6 Pts	4-Core 54.1 8-Core 50.6 7% 52.3 Pts	64-Core 39.2 2% 39.2 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 380F) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.40.16 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.92% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.92% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB 3,232 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 854GB free (System drive) Firmware: LCM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 26 20 21 27 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.93% Terrible	Read 1.7 Write 17.4 Mixed 5 SusWrite 25.6 9% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.1 35% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 7.93% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5704-001.A00G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 7.1 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 240 17% 240 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	17x
A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 28%, 7,071 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	17x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 75%, 1,698 samples	7x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	1x
MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 81%, 7,649 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	7x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	4x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 13,712 samples	2x