Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '21 at 00:49
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 173
2-Core 344
109% 203 Pts
4-Core 678
8-Core 1,217
114% 948 Pts
64-Core 3,069
190% 3,069 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 19
Parallax 19.2
15% 18.9 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 17.7
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
447GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 465 465 466 467 466 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 452
Mixed 452
SusWrite 465
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 57.2
186% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 760 437 437 437 435 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,627
Write 2,301
Mixed 1,614
SusWrite 489
391% 1,758 MB/s
4K Read 71.8
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 99.5
340% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,009
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 1,096
791% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 284%
Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
681GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 465 466 466 467 466 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 452
Mixed 454
SusWrite 465
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 57
187% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
908GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 465 466 466 467 466 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 452
Mixed 455
SusWrite 465
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 56
184% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$113
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3311 3326 3327 2542 1710 1717 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
439% Outstanding
Read 2,832
Write 3,316
Mixed 3,022
SusWrite 2,656
668% 2,957 MB/s
4K Read 80.2
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 110
355% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,364
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 1,141
862% 1,164 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 439%
Great: 477%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 185 186 187 188 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 198
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 187
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C18 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
148% Outstanding
MC Read 79.7
MC Write 44.6
MC Mixed 44.8
161% 56.4 GB/s
SC Read 32.5
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 43.4
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 148%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $471

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,555
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback