HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150713
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 02 '21 at 21:01
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	MAR-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 68.2 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 176 63% 111 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 312 42% 314 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% PNY(196E 1365) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43% Average	Lighting 54 Reflection 44.8 Parallax 51.4 44% 50.1 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 49 Splatting 44.6 41% 51.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2128G 128GB 2,128 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1127B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 11 50 26 29 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 420 Write 344 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 37.6 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 15.8 4K Mixed 1.1 41% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 13 DQ Mixed 0.3 21% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 217GB free Firmware: KC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 78 74 80 75 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 107 Write 100 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 78 64% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.9% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 12.5 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 13.6 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,651 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	840x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	762x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	750x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1,198x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	367x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	246x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	59x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	56x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	53x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	46x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16