HP h9-1191ea

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP h9-1191ea (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141020
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 06 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 208 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 520 51% 420 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 36E1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1774 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Lighting 70.1 Reflection 74.2 Parallax 65.8 57% 70 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 66.7 Splatting 59.5 53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mtfddak1 28MAM-1J1 128GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0809 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 414 Write 189 Mixed 221 60% 275 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 17 81% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 57.5 62% 103 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB 3,312 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 346GB free Firmware: MN5OA5Q0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 68 68 67 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 81.5 Write 87.9 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 66.6 53% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 79%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1TB 946 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 368GB free, PID 0b1a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 104 104 81 105 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 96.2 Write 50.4 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 97.7 76% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 9% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 17.1 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 18.8 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h9-1191ea Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 69%

Battle cruiser

System: HP h9-1191ea

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	2x

RAM
CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 16GBUnknownBench 55%, 4 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $820

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16