Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '21 at 08:52
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 693
65% 543 Pts
64-Core 899
56% 899 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3714) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2130 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 117
Parallax 110
84% 110 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 106
Splatting 104
85% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 128GB 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0529A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 450
Write 313
Mixed 328
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 20.9
116% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 0.8
33% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 106%
Fujitsu MHY2200BH 200GB-$48
186GB free
Firmware: 0000000B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 48 47 47 48 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 46.5
Write 45.9
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 46.9
31% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 27%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
39GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 97
Write 99.6
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 76.1
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
197GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
47% Average
Read 103
Write 99.3
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 60.4
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 33.7
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 29.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 104%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback