Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4157BL5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4157BL5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20090917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 02:24
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3520-$230
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 140
60% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 352
36% 291 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 65.1%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.00
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 1.6
4% 3.6 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 2.9
3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.46%
 Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 30 48 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 45.3
Write 78.5
Mixed 19
SusWrite 41.3
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
58% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 24.8%
 Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$28
6GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 63 64 63 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 62.3
Write 61
Mixed 46
SusWrite 63.2
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 36.1%
 Great: 70%
MXT-USB Storage Device 128GB
35GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1 1 1 1 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.9
1% 0.77 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 1.64%
 Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.7% Poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 21.7%
 Great: 65%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $292WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback