Asus H61M-A/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-A/BR  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 15:57
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 363
48% 363 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E263) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 8.6
5% 6.8 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 5.9
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 32 51 75 82 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 80.2
Write 84.5
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 63.3
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
39GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 100 101 104 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 86.5
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 101
55% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 98%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
7GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 64 74 70 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 87.4
Write 48.4
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 66.7
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
16GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 95 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 101
Write 45.7
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 95.9
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 59%
Kingston DT 101 II 2GB
1GB free, PID 1625
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.37% Terrible
Read 6.8
Write 3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.1
5% 3.85 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.37%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-036.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-A/BR Builds (Compare 530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback