Asrock X79 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130227
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 12:01
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 193
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 488
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
MSI(1462 3609) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 186
Parallax 178
134% 176 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 177
Splatting 123
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 171 174 168 167 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 454
Mixed 391
SusWrite 198
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 41.9
140% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 124%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
861GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 96 96 96 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 91.7
Mixed 97
SusWrite 94.8
70% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4 F3-14900CL9-4 F3-12800CL9-4 F3-12800CL9-4 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 31
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback