Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	May 11 '21 at 03:16
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 79.7 2-Core 166 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 329 36% 286 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.3% Very good	Lighting 98.1 Reflection 110 Parallax 98.9 80% 102 fps	MRender 90.2 Gravity 96.4 Splatting 98.2 78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,939 Write 3,852 Mixed 4,008 880% 3,933 MB/s	4K Read 244 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 142 632% 179 MB/s	DQ Read 873 DQ Write 549 DQ Mixed 685 518% 703 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$69 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 168GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 106 86 103 109 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 103 Write 105 Mixed 65 SusWrite 99 68% 93 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 04CD F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17.8 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 16.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	462x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	374x
Core i7-2600Intel $173Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	203x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	119x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	109x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	100x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	50x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	48x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	35x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370