Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '17 at 17:14
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 94.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 218
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 347
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$82
Gigabyte(1458 3747) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 27
Parallax 33
30% 32.2 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 33.3
28% 35 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 479
Write 258
Mixed 276
74% 338 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 27.6
114% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.9
DQ Write 94.3
DQ Mixed 14.3
24% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
437GB free
Firmware: MS1OA810 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 186
Mixed 184
137% 181 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.22
92% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback