NEC PC-MK32LLZTJFSB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNEC PC-MK32LLZTJFSB  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC MS-7451VM
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100903
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 18:29
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
SOCKET1156 M/B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 73
2-Core 127
51% 86.8 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 180
22% 170 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Device(1033 892A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.5
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HDSSD240GJP3 240GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0411A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 64 51 64 56 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.3% Below average
Read 209
Write 69.2
Mixed 179
SusWrite 64.5
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 11.6
63% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 14
22% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 79%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 240GB
208GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 20 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 27.7
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 21
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 5.2
1,007% 6.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 22%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 8.7 9 9 9 8.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
6.69% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 8
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 8.5
13% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMD-4G68H1P-16K 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.3% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.3
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback