Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200826
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 08:30
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 205
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 663
63% 523 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 28.4
14% 19.6 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 15.8
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 376 132 26 218 243 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 360
Write 368
Mixed 325
SusWrite 228
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 34.8
127% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 187
143% 191 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 99%
BFDT01S 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 149 103 129 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 140
Write 143
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 136
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback