| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock P67 Pro3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110622 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 20 '21 at 14:49 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 29,659,526 GHz (avg)
|
71.7%
Very good
|
69% 117 Pts
|
46% 340 Pts
|
22% 355 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
|
32.9%
Below average
|
35% 40.8 fps
|
28% 35.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 202 220 227 217 215 MB/s
|
66.3%
Good
|
65% 291 MB/s
|
114% 39.8 MB/s
|
40% 57.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905403-444.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.1%
Poor
|
26% 9.17 GB/s
|
27% 9.43 GB/s
|
53% 75.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P67 Pro3 Builds (Compare 526 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock P67 Pro3 - $94
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 213x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 45x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 43x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 46x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 34x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 32x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $620 |