Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171108
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 23:03
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 121
60% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 438
43% 350 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Fujitsu(10CF 1932) 2GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 10.3
10% 12.5 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 13.5
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.5
0% 1.1 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Innovation IT 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0704A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 187 184 186 186 178 MB/s
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.6% Average
Read 219
Write 178
Mixed 178
SusWrite 181
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 20.4
92% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 23.8
26% 41 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 95%
Seagate USB 2.0 Cable 480GB
222GB free, PID 5020
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 25 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 24.6
Write 24.5
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 24.2
34% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2.7
128% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 76%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 32GB
18GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 9.9 10 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 18.2
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 10.8
24% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 3.2
242% 4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
8GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 3.5 4.6 3.9 4.4 3.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 4
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.2
9% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.3
172% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 6.9
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.6
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 R2 Builds (Compare 926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback