Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory33.5 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190401
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 22 '21 at 04:43
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User PRY-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 120
2-Core 232
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 432
58% 430 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.4% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 57
Parallax 49.9
47% 54.7 fps
MRender 55.7
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 51.3
43% 52.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 74 88 86 81 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 361
Write 97.2
Mixed 110
SusWrite 80.2
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 34.2
89% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 87.3
DQ Mixed 120
88% 116 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 91%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
56GB free
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 108 81 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 430
Write 249
Mixed 260
SusWrite 111
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 18.6
76% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 85.3
DQ Mixed 42.6
48% 82.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 53%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
241GB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 244 27 86 27 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 477
Write 425
Mixed 393
SusWrite 136
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 12.5
44% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 95.7
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 69.5
94% 162 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C16/8G 40GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback