PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 5.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z200 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B40h |
Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160211 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | May 23 '21 at 15:04 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
48.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
|
5.09%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 84 13 53 53 29 MB/s
|
25.7%
Poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 21 23 21 20 MB/s
|
22.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 58x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 37x |
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 29x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 19x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 17x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
SSD | |
---|---|
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 11x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 10x |
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $152 |