Gigabyte GA-H410M S2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H410M S2  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200413
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '21 at 21:57
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$64
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 129
2-Core 237
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 682
68% 557 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 83.3
Parallax 51.4
47% 64 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 50.8
44% 54.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 419 408 419 399 379 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 444
Mixed 425
SusWrite 404
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 46.8
159% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 294
240% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.M8FJ 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 11
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H410M S2 Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $194
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback