Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC7JYB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel(R) NUC7CJYH
MotherboardIntel NUC7JYB  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 24 '21 at 12:28
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 40.1
1-Core 56.4
2-Core 111
39% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 108
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2072) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.6
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL300 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VA001CB6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 313 308 59 143 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 323
Write 307
Mixed 273
SusWrite 208
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 15.8
68% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 64.2
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 106
96% 139 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D22.2356BS.001 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7JYB Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7JYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $24
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback