Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite A200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite A200  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA ISKAA
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 14:46
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4300
U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 43.9
1-Core 12.2
2-Core 12.8
19% 23 Pts
4-Core 12.4
8-Core 14.5
2% 13.4 Pts
64-Core 13.5
1% 13.5 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Toshiba(1179 FF00) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.68 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.23
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.74 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3252GSX 320GB-$70
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LV010A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 54.1
Write 48.6
Mixed 24.6
31% 42.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite A200 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite A200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback