Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime7 Days
Run DateMay 26 '21 at 22:54
Run Duration906 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 124
55% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 277
31% 245 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Sapphire(174B E204) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.25% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.8
1% 1.73 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.25%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 410 389 363 349 411 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
395GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 113 116 114 120 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 96.3
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 113
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
279GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 81 87 73 88 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 87
Write 85.8
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 81.2
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB
630GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 114 114 115 116 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 200
Write 231
Mixed 121
SusWrite 112
122% 166 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
217% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/8GX 32GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 85.9
46% 85.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback