Thunderit 520004

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemThunderit 520004  (all builds)
MotherboardASRockRack X470D4U2/1N1
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201222
Uptime14 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 13:08
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 8-Core
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 142
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 695
54% 480 Pts
64-Core 1,437
89% 1,437 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KCD51LUG960G 960GB
734GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 430 430 429 430 430 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
210% Outstanding
Read 1,703
Write 850
Mixed 723
SusWrite 429
204% 926 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 53.8
211% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,487
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 1,091
829% 1,135 MB/s
KCD51LUG960G 960GB
734GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 430 430 429 430 428 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
214% Outstanding
Read 1,694
Write 728
Mixed 730
SusWrite 429
197% 895 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 54.3
216% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,589
DQ Write 845
DQ Mixed 1,164
879% 1,199 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CTD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.2% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 30.1
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 29.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback