Asus WS X299 PRO_SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 169%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive984% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus WS X299 PRO_SE  (all builds)
Memory100.7 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 14:47
Run Duration449 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 970
89% 744 Pts
64-Core 3,019
187% 3,019 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 6000
Nvidia(10DE 12BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 244
Parallax 185
146% 203 fps
MRender 231
Gravity 243
Splatting 207
184% 227 fps
Poor: 136%
This bench: 147%
Great: 173%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4545 2841 2850 2855 2854 2115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
984% Outstanding
Read 4,121
Write 7,462
Mixed 4,494
SusWrite 3,010
1,081% 4,772 MB/s
4K Read 595
4K Write 498
4K Mixed 527
1,840% 540 MB/s
DQ Read 1,665
DQ Write 1,288
DQ Mixed 1,451
1,092% 1,468 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 984%
Great: 486%
Qnap QDA-A2MAR RAID0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5374 782 740 777 744 741 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
902% Outstanding
Read 3,858
Write 6,892
Mixed 4,084
SusWrite 1,526
925% 4,090 MB/s
4K Read 570
4K Write 525
4K Mixed 568
1,869% 554 MB/s
DQ Read 1,779
DQ Write 1,389
DQ Mixed 1,583
1,184% 1,584 MB/s
Microsoft Storage Space Device 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1707 3748 751 795 772 770 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 76% Great: 87%
OWC SoftRAID 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3225 2624 1146 1617 1330 1384 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
897% Outstanding
Read 2,590
Write 4,512
Mixed 2,871
SusWrite 1,888
672% 2,965 MB/s
4K Read 628
4K Write 520
4K Mixed 569
1,955% 572 MB/s
DQ Read 1,777
DQ Write 1,443
DQ Mixed 1,568
1,185% 1,596 MB/s
Poor: 391%
This bench: 897%
Great: 897%
Sabrent Rocket Q 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4312 2866 2875 2879 2875 2865 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
1,023% Outstanding
Read 3,841
Write 6,959
Mixed 4,172
SusWrite 3112
1,025% 4,521 MB/s
4K Read 621
4K Write 527
4K Mixed 573
1,954% 574 MB/s
DQ Read 1,777
DQ Write 1,477
DQ Mixed 1,568
1,190% 1,607 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 1,023%
Great: 403%
OWC SoftRAID 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: RA
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3886
Write 6,743
Mixed 4,165
1,112% 4,931 MB/s
4K Read 631
4K Write 525
4K Mixed 561
1,953% 572 MB/s
DQ Read 1,770
DQ Write 1,493
DQ Mixed 1,602
1,208% 1,622 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 CM4X32GC3600C18K2D CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 CM4X32GC3600C18K2D CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 255GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600, 3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 66.8
MC Mixed 51.8
157% 54.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 10.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 112%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS X299 PRO_SE Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 186%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 PRO_SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $824
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback