Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70 39,812 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 187 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 532 53% 433 Pts	64-Core 563 35% 563 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 0990) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.36% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 6.4 Parallax 1.5 3% 3.93 fps	MRender 6.2 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 3.5 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.36% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Cf300 120GB 120GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8312c06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 358 350 349 120 218 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 432 Write 346 Mixed 294 SusWrite 289 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 31.8 113% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 80.1 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 118 97% 135 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 76%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84 9,234 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 691GB free Firmware: ST6OA3CA SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 99 100 96 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 97.7 Write 99.5 Mixed 51.6 SusWrite 97.9 63% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 1x8GB 3,554 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	44.8% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 13.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 13.6 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	340x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	256x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	232x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	173x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	58x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	50x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $318