HP Pro 3405 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pro 3405 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '21 at 15:15
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 44.3
1-Core 36
2-Core 69.5
31% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 69.9
8-Core 69.6
9% 69.8 Pts
64-Core 72.2
4% 72.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6370D
HP(103C 2ACF) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.49% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.49%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 199 83 70 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.9% Average
Read 233
Write 168
Mixed 196
SusWrite 124
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 19.8
74% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 134
103% 139 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 87%
Generic USB Flash Disk 64GB
11GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.5 4.8 4.5 4.7 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Read 31.1
Write 10
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 4.5
11% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 51264T133I NYA 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.9% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3405 Series Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3405 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback