Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2665 0 619 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 78.1 1-Core 81.1 2-Core 161 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 588 54% 449 Pts	64-Core 1,487 92% 1,487 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% HP(103C 82DF) 2GB CLim: 1552 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.5% Poor	Lighting 28 Reflection 40.3 Parallax 31.6 23% 33.3 fps	MRender 42.3 Gravity 31.2 Splatting 30 28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 913GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 749GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 404 410 419 423 424 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 505 Write 387 Mixed 292 SusWrite 414 90% 399 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 21 68% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 164 139% 202 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 164%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix-00AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GB 150 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	MC Read 43.5 MC Write 38.7 MC Mixed 34.7 111% 39 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6.8 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	97x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	82x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	62x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	41x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	39x
M393B1G70BH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 67%, 378 samples	24x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $170

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16