Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 01:23
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 74.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 306
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 783
86% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,083
67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Lighting 93.2
Reflection 91.6
Parallax 83.9
76% 89.6 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 81.5
Splatting 72.6
71% 88.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 904 845 825 665 620 722 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,374
Write 2,618
Mixed 1,633
SusWrite 764
362% 1,597 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 80.5
280% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,311
DQ Write 893
DQ Mixed 1,116
829% 1,107 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 237%
Great: 284%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
832GB free
Firmware: SPS6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 93 94 94 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 57.9
Write 77.4
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 90.1
46% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.5
170% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 138 145 148 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 93.2
Write 144
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 141
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
97% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.3% Very good
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 31.8
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 32.6
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $944
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $107Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback