Sysgen Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSysgen Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H12SSL-i
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 11:08
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core
CPU, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
75% 139 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 937
83% 705 Pts
64-Core 3,533
219% 3,533 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 19.1
15% 18.8 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.5
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago MR9361-8i 480GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 478 481 476 475 481 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Avago MR9361-8i 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 482 482 480 479 481 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 80% Great: 87%
Avago MR9361-8i 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 482 482 480 479 481 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 80% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40DB3-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 34.8
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 28.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback