Today's hottest deals

Walton WTEX4105SL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemWalton WTEX4105SL  (all builds)
MotherboardWALTON WTEX4105SL
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190822
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 11:26
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 199
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 344
41% 318 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 1403) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 7
5% 5.53 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10
6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Im3d B16A SSD 512GB
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 186 79 45 34 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 436
Write 401
Mixed 375
SusWrite 90.9
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.7
35% 9.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WT-S8G2666H 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WTEX4105SL Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Walton WTEX4105SL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback