Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '21 at 04:52
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 104
49% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 208
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.6% Good
Lighting 90.5
Reflection 88.8
Parallax 77.5
74% 85.6 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 80.7
Splatting 0.2
35% 48.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 84 124 120 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 134
Write 130
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 106
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 109%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
685GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 114 118 124 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 77.3
Write 63.9
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 118
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.7
254% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 102%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
12GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17.9
Mixed 4.5
10% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-10666CL8-2GBECO F3-10666CL8-2GBECO 12GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11.9
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback