PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191011 |
Uptime | 4.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 10 '21 at 15:32 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
84.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
80.5%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $115Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,003x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 926x |
Core i3-8100Intel $148Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 204x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $147Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 496x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 428x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $201Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 383x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $287 |