Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive479% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '21 at 19:45
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 968
94% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,469
91% 1,469 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$495
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 222
Reflection 204
Parallax 212
181% 213 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 153
Splatting 135
129% 161 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3862 3940 3872 4041 4034 4041 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
479% Outstanding
Read 2,258
Write 3,790
Mixed 2,268
SusWrite 3,965
698% 3,070 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 88.5
302% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,287
DQ Write 1091
DQ Mixed 1,190
892% 1,190 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 479%
Great: 492%
Transcend SSD370 512GB-$179
477GB free
Firmware: N1114H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 402 406 418 421 419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 410
Mixed 304
SusWrite 413
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 39.9
138% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 156
125% 175 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 105%
MB6000GVYZB 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 210 219 224 224 224 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 234
Write 222
Mixed 100
SusWrite 219
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 1.3
11% 5.23 MB/s
DQ Read 2.9
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 2
3% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 26%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2568 2569 2569 2569 2006 975 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
422% Outstanding
Read 3,024
Write 2,527
Mixed 2,562
SusWrite 2,209
580% 2,580 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 92.9
329% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,517
DQ Write 1,392
DQ Mixed 1,444
1,086% 1,451 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 422%
Great: 578%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 34.2
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 38.6
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $188

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $991
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback