Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571LH_F571LH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571LH_F571LH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571LH
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '21 at 07:15
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 258
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 648
68% 543 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 1002) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6663
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 51.1
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 48.2
42% 51.1 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 46.6
Splatting 42.7
40% 50.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 295 288 286 283 281 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,120
Write 739
Mixed 664
SusWrite 302
157% 706 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 57.6
200% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 863
DQ Mixed 732
564% 759 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 159%
Great: 189%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
543GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 62 62 62 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 118
Write 88.3
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 60.4
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
189% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 21.2
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 23.7
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571LH_F571LH Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571LH_F571LH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback