Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z590M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z590M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '21 at 15:07
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$245
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 158
2-Core 312
104% 189 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 1,232
109% 924 Pts
64-Core 2,093
130% 2,093 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 106%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$806
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (156 fps cap detected)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 156
Parallax 156
127% 156 fps
MRender 156
Gravity 156
Splatting 156
128% 156 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 122%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,512
Write 2,283
Mixed 1,592
473% 2,129 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 68.2
224% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 497
DQ Mixed 668
498% 669 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB
865GB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 167 169 169 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 187
Write 170
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 166
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.7
7% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$21
133GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 105 106 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 88.1
Write 68.8
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 103
52% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 166 161 165 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 149
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 163
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 110%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$21
494GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 129 129 129 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 148
Write 131
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 129
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.5
435% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80%
Great: 108%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
462GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 6
Mixed 6
SusWrite 1.7
7% 5.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 16 17 17 17 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.41% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 6.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 17.1
13% 9.38 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 20%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
565GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.6% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 30.1
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 28.7
40% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 24
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 28.2
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 50.4
79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z590M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z590M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $382
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback