Today's hottest deals

Positivo VJF155

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 51% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPositivo VJF155  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJF155
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180613
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 02:36
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 51%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 80.8
42% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 131
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Clevo(1558 2425) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7528
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 0.1
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S3SSDA120 120GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0411A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 50 47 47 48 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 434
Write 49.2
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 51.4
31% 147 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 4.7
39% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 32
44% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
601GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 114 116 114 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 74
Write 105
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 114
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.2
89% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AEDS1600W8G11-BNAD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJF155 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJF155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback