PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH Z170 MARK 1 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180314 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 15 '21 at 02:22 |
Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
Run User | MEX-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7700T
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
|
45.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 104 11 79 107 5.6 MB/s
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
39.5%
Below average
|
||||
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
16GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 5.4 6.9 7.5 7.2 8.2 MB/s
|
5.58%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
13GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
32.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ DDR4 3000 2OZ 16GB
2720, 2720 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
47.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 478x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 80x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 48x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 66x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 64x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 43x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $532 |