Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper 3  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 04:34
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 98
2-Core 191
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 472
53% 416 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 400A) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 0.8
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 630 240GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N191
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 9.4 13 11 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 292
Write 12
Mixed 24
SusWrite 10.9
18% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 14.2
50% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 56.1
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 20.8
19% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX3M4X2133C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 3R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 6% 80 20 1 60 23.5" 1920 1080 AOC2461 2461W
History:
Typical GA-G1.Sniper 3 Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $117Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $83
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback