Today's hottest deals

Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive20.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B75M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1332 x 760 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 09:47
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 176
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 500
54% 429 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Asus(1043 864E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 8.4
6% 7.6 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 9
Splatting 7.6
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S300 120GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0617A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 5 54 73 5.9 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 352
Write 141
Mixed 11.3
SusWrite 37.6
29% 136 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.4
16% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 83%
Netac 240G 240GB
154GB free
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 64 52 71 10 28 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.9% Poor
Read 252
Write 216
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 51.2
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
29% 7.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$46
52GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 71 72 68 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 73.8
Write 71.6
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 70.3
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
300GB free
Firmware: 3.CHN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 78 77 74 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 75.6
Write 71.4
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 74.6
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown S939A2UGS-ITR Kingston 9965525-116.A00LF 0B13 S939A2UGS-ITR Kingston 9965525-118.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 32" 1280 720 BBY0019 LCDTV
Typical B75M-PLUS Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback