PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365M-HDV (all builds) |
Memory | 5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190515 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 21 '21 at 13:34 |
Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
63.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$234
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team T253X1240G 240GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 58 61 43 44 44 MB/s
|
36.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$39
563GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 109 110 137 139 139 MB/s
|
73%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate BUP Slim Mac SL 1TB
800GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 55 63 62 61 70 MB/s
|
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 6 | 4 | 144 | 24" | 1280 720 | BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $83Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 875x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $112Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 279x |
Core i5-8400Intel $85Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 124x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $234Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 179x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $152Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 170x |
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 154x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $317 |