Today's hottest deals

Asrock B365M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B365M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190515
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 13:34
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 202
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 602
54% 457 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$234
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 46.5
41% 54.3 fps
MRender 98.1
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 44.6
56% 71.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1240G 240GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 58 61 43 44 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 289
Write 269
Mixed 223
SusWrite 60
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 1.2
46% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 35.1
73% 145 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 92%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$39
563GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 109 110 137 139 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 133
Write 133
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 122
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73%
Great: 87%
Seagate BUP Slim Mac SL 1TB
800GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 55 63 62 61 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 59.9
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 62.4
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 4 144 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical B365M-HDV Builds (Compare 2,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock B365M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback