Inversenet FRONTIER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemInversenet FRONTIER  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock H570 Phantom Gaming 4
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210426
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 06:31
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900F-$227
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 190
2-Core 378
117% 220 Pts
4-Core 732
8-Core 1,337
124% 1,034 Pts
64-Core 1,188
74% 1,188 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 115%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$497
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB; Manli M-NRTX3070/6RGHPPP-M2479
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 209
Parallax 198
178% 208 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 156
Splatting 137
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
544GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 1427 1171 744 95 240 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,531
Write 1,604
Mixed 1,094
SusWrite 678
275% 1,227 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 83.4
298% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 469
434% 658 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 228%
Great: 255%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 166 169 166 170 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 189
Write 173
Mixed 102
SusWrite 161
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.8
13% 4.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 0.9
2% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4U2S8ME-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 32.6
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 31.4
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 5R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 54% 26 108 6 60 21.5" 1920 1080 HWP3058 HP P221
Typical FRONTIER Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

System: Inversenet FRONTIER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $730
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback