Acer TMP453-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer TMP453-M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BA50_HC
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130409
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 13:39
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 148
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 204
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0722) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA250CM10002 250GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 300 303 271 287 290 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 443
Write 420
Mixed 221
SusWrite 283
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 24.5
76% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 205
168% 245 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 104%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
23GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 62 63 64 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 60.6
Write 58
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 63.2
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
159% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO23EC
Typical TMP453-M Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TMP453-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback