Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '21 at 00:15
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 158
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 305
41% 306 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 37.3
29% 37.2 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 26.3
27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 325 336 333 341 341 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 348
Mixed 312
SusWrite 333
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 35.9
122% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 269
228% 333 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 128%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
378GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 160 160 162 162 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 130
Write 126
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 159
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 107%
WD WD7500AACS-00D6B0 750GB
128GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 47 45 46 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 52.9
Write 51.2
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 46
35% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G13332 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 8502 PSD34G13332 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 10.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ8024 BenQ LCD
Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback