Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '21 at 00:15
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2300 19,722 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	70% Good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 73.6 2-Core 158 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 305 41% 306 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.59 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28% Poor	Lighting 35.1 Reflection 39.2 Parallax 37.3 29% 37.2 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 26.3 27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$54 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 325 336 333 341 341 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 348 Mixed 312 SusWrite 333 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 35.9 122% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 269 228% 333 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 128%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 378GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 160 160 162 162 163 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Read 130 Write 126 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 159 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 107%
WD WD7500AACS-00D6B0 750GB 4,630 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 128GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 47 45 46 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 52.9 Write 51.2 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 46 35% 47.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD34G13332 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 8502 PSD34G13332 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.7% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 10.6 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.1 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	27"	1280 720	BNQ8024 BenQ LCD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $80Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	70x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	38x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	34x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	38x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 20,728 samples	8x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	6x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 3x2GBSamsungBench 33%, 184 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $118

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363